RAA HomeForewordSitemapContact AuditFeedback to Audit 3 September 2010  
Audit Plans
Audit Reports
Papers
Archives
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
RAA Photo Gallery

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 Potential Fraud Indicators

 

Table of Contents

Foreword
Meaning of Fraud
Distinction between Fraud and Error
     
Part I. Frauds Committed by Employers

1. Need for Goods or Services
2.
Development of Statements of Work and specifications
3.
Pre-Solicitation Phase
4.
Solicitation Phase
5.
Bid Acceptance
6.
False certifications by contractors
7.
Evaluation of Bids and Proposals
8.
Documents from competing firms containing similar
9.
Fraud in the Award of the Contract
10.
Negotiation of a Contract
11.
Post-Award Phase
12.
Non regular reconciliation’s of accounts related to
13.
Defective Pricing
14.
Collusive Bidding and Price Fixing
15.
Cost Mischarging
16.
Product Substitution
17.
Progress Payment Fraud
18.
Criminal and Regulatory Violations by Employees

Part II. Frauds committed by Contractors and individuals

1.
Pre Award Fraud
2.
Collusive Bidding
3.
Contractor Fraud
           
False claims and statements
           
Procurement  by Government Personnel
           
Bribery and Illegal Gratuities
           
Collusive Bidding
           
Overstatement of Household Goods Shipment Weights
4.
Financial Fraud
5.
Checks and Other Financial Records
6.
Assumed Names, Records of Incorporation

Indicators

7.
Glossary of Fraud Schemes and Terms

Indicators of Potential Fraud-Personnel

Foreword

The common perception is that the Royal Audit Authority carries out audit to identify fraud. The universal conviction is that audits of accounts is an assurance that there is no unobserved fraud. In this respect it is essential to understand that various types of audits have diverse objectives. Occasionally, an audit is conducted principally to detect fraud (for example, in certain internal audits, this is one of the main objectives). However, in the case of the other types of audit, the question of detection of fraud has to be seen with reference to the precise objective of each audit. For example, the objective of an independent financial audit is to determine whether the financial statements present a fair and true view of the financial position and the working results of an establishment. Therefore, the audits method and line for conducting such an audit are directed towards attainment of this objective rather than towards detection of fraud (though their detection is often an incidental result of such an audit also).

Indicators of fraud are clues and hints of certain area of activity that needs extra attention. Usually, there are two approaches that a person meaning on committing fraud will consider, choosing one over the other depending on skill, experience, inclination and the level of internal controls. Firstly, the activities may be either completely veiled from view and secondly the activity may be conducted in the open, completely noticeable to all, but disguised to appear as if they are part of the normal process.

It is, therefore very essential for the auditors to know the customary practice of the system. It is difficult to detect a well-designed fraud if you have unclear objectives.

In certain cases inadequate attention by the employers to the rule, give rise to errors which are often possible indicators of fraud, the difference between errors and fraud is fine line called the intent.

It is my sincere belief that greater importance be given in fraud prevention in the overall exercise of constructing a clean and proud public service.

Preventing dishonest conduct before its prevalence advances two of the focal rationale of the criminal law: preventing criminals conduct and shielding the public from unsafe wrongdoer. Undeniably, the mark of the truly successful fraud enforcement is its efficiency not only in apprehending those who have already violated the law, but also in preventing others from committing forthcoming acts of fraud.

This manuscript makes an attempt to display the indicators of fraud and makes a humble effort to classify them. I urge every auditor of the RAA to consider this manuscript as reference for detecting fraud and most importantly to make the best use of his or her position to prevent fraud from oppressing the citizens of this Nation. I am confident that we can considerably condense the incidence of fraud and its incapacitating effects. 

Kunzang Wangdi
Auditor General of Bhutan


Meaning of Fraud

The term fraud may be defined as the unbeaten custom of dishonesty or any pretense with the intention of cheating or injuring another person or an establishment. As this definition underlines, the most important element of fraud is the intention or the motive of the person commiting it, viz, to cheat or injure another person or establishment. Consider, for example, the following. 

A construction of a house has been awarded on plinth area basis. On completion of the house Ap. Dorji, the Section Officer takes measurement of the house and records more in the measurement book. Nima the contractor submits his final bill with the elevated measurements and gets the payment from Ugen the Finance Officer.Ap. Dorji, Nima and Ugyen share the difference.

The store keeper, while issuing 50 bags of cement records the quantity as 150 cement bags in his record, sells of 100 bags and pockets the sales proceeds. 

Quotations are called from the hotels for catering lunch to 50 people. The menu reads, Ants climbing hill, chevy levy. Most of the hotels have not heard such dishes exists so they do not quote. Thupsop Chencho wins the catering and makes a tidy profit. Thupsop Chencho and Tashi, the AFD head later meet in a bar and Chencho presents Tashi with a Senao phone.

Ants climbing hill is actually mashed potatoes with minced meat and chevy levy is actually boiled bamboo shoots.

Distinction between Fraud and Error

The basic distinction between fraud and error is that of the intention. Any error is unintentional, i.e. the person committing the error does not do so knowingly. Errors are accidental and may arise due to negligence or a genuine misunderstanding on the part of the person committing them. As opposed to errors the fraud is intentional . The person committing fraud does so knowingly, ,willfully, and with the motive of gaining advantage or benefit by cheating or causing loss or injury to another persons, acting in collusion with one another. The distinction between fraud and error can be explained by a simple example. Suppose the counterfoils of a cash receipts come to the accountant in the evening for recording in the cash book. Being in a hurry, he leaves them on his table. Accidentally one the counterfoils falls on the ground and is carried way by the sweeper in the morning. The accountant is unaware of this and records the rest of the counterfoil in the cash book. This is a case of error since it is unintentional-it has not been committed willfully or knowingly by the accountant. On the other hand, suppose the cashier and the accountant decide to misappropriate cash receipts. The cashier alters the counterfoil of the cash receipt and sends them to the accountant who ignores the alterations and enters the altered amount in the cash book. This is a case of fraud since it is done deliberately with a view to gaining a benefit by causing a loss to the enterprise.

Part I. Frauds Committed by Employers

The potential for fraud is created when the need assessment is not adequately or accurately developed.  A Government agency, which, with or without collusion, continually changes its mind about what it wants, will make it possible for a contractor to substantially increase the contract price.  With respect to fraud in defining requirements and stock levels, fraud indicators include:                  

FRAUD                                                           

1. Need for Goods or Services

Maintaining excessively high stock levels to justify continued purchases from certain contractors.

Declaring serviceable items as excess or selling them as surplus while continuing purchasing from certain contractors. 

Purchasing in response to aggressive marketing efforts by contractors rather than in response to valid necessities. 

Defining needs in ways that can be met only by specific contractors. 

Estimates are not prepared. 

Estimates prepared after solicitations are requested. 

Failure to develop second-sources.

2. Development of Statements of Work and specifications 

Bid specifications and statements of work are intended to provide both potential bidders and the selecting officials with a firm basis for making and accepting bids.  A well-written contract will have specifications, standards and statements of work, which make it clear what the Government is entitled to.  Sloppy or carelessly written specifications make it easy for a contractor to overcharge or for it to deliver less than expected. 

Fraud indicators include:

Defining statements of work to fit capabilities of a single contractor. 

Defining specifications to fit a single product. 

Advance release of information by Government employees  to favored contractors. 

Selective release of information to favored contractors. 

Developing statement of work in consultation with favored contractors. 

Allowing firms to participate in project design to obtain those same contracts. 

Release of information by firms participating in project design to contractors competing for the prime contract. 

Designing pre-qualification standards to exclude otherwise qualified contractors or their products. 

Break up of requirements to allow rotation of bids. 

Splitting up requirements to get under small purchase requirements. 

Irregularity in bid specifications with the items included in the general requirements. 

Irregularity in the statement of work with items included in the general requirements. 

Vague specifications that make practical comparisons of estimates complex. 

Specifications those are inconsistent with past comparable type procurements. 

Work Order issued without work site locations finalized. 

Advances made prior to the approval of  the site and designs.

3. Pre-Solicitation Phase

Unwarranted sole source justifications. 

Erroneous statements to justify sole source of negotiated procurement. 

Justifications for sole source signed by officials lacking authority. 

Justification for negotiated procurement signed by officials lacking authority. 

Non-valid restrictions   in the solicitation documents, to limit competition. 

Providing advance information to contractors on a special basis by technical personnel. 

Providing advance information to contractors.            

4. Solicitation Phase          

Restriction  on procurements to prevent any qualified contractor.

Restriction  on procurements to obstruct any qualified contractor. 

Limiting the time for submission of bids so that only those with advance information have adequate time to prepare bids or proposals. 

Revealing un revealed information about procurement to one contractor, 

Conducting bidders conference in a way, which invites bid rigging or price fixing or permits improper communications between contractors. 

Failure to assure that a sufficient number of potential competitors are aware of the solicitation. 

Vague bid solicitation as to the time, place, or other requirements for submitting acceptable bids. 

Having little or no control over the number and destination of bid packages sent to interested bidders. 

Indecent communication with contractors at trade or professional meetings. 

Improper social contact with contractor representatives. 

Obtaining stock by Government personnel or their families in a contractor or sub contractor. 

Obtaining financial interest by Government personnel or their families in a contractor or sub contractor. 

Discussions by Government personnel for likely employment with a contractor. 

Discussions by Government personnel for likely employment with a sub contractor for themselves or a family member.

Special assistance to any contractor in preparing his bid or proposal. 

Reference of a contractor to a specific sub contractor, expert, or source of supply. 

Failure to adjust solicitation to include necessary changes or clarifications.            

5. Bid Acceptance        

Improper acceptance of a late bid. 

Falsification of documents or receipts to get a late bid accepted. 

Change in a bid after other bidders prices are known.  

Withdrawal of the lowest bidder who may become a sub contractor to the higher bidder who gets the contract. 

Collusion or bid rigging between bidders. 

Revealing one bidder's price to another. 

Falsification in contractor’s qualifications. 

Falsifications in contractor’s financial capability. 

 Falsifications in contractor’s facilities, ownership of equipment and supplies. 

 Falsifications in contractor’s qualifications of personnel. 

Falsifications in contractor’s successful performance of previous jobs. 

Certificate of reasons from qualified bidders for not participating. 

Attempt to influence decisions on the acceptance of the bids. 

Submission of the bids by one bidder in different parties name. 

Bidders with multiple license in the same trade.              

6. False certifications by contractors                 

1.  Certification of Small business.

2.  Certification of Minority business.

3.  Information provided to other agencies to support special status.

4.  Certification of independent price determination.

5.  Buy-Bhutan Act certification.

6.  Certification of Manufacturer's warranty. 

7. Evaluation of Bids and Proposals 

Rejection of bids or proposal without any valid reason.

Deliberately loss of the bid or proposal

Improperly disqualifying the bid or proposal.

Disqualifying the contractor improperly.

Accepting non-responsive bids from preferred contractors. 

Seeming unnecessary contacts during solicitation, 

Seeming unnecessary contacts during evaluation, 

Seeming unnecessary contacts during negotiation processes. 

Unauthorized release of information to a contractor or other person. 

Exercise of favoritism toward a particular contractor during the evaluation process. 

Use of biased evaluation criteria. 

Use of biased individuals on the evaluation panel. 

Name of a odd company that suggests the firm may not provide the type of service or product being solicited.                 

8. Documents from competing firms containing similar:               

1.  Company names.

2.  Handwriting/signatures.

3.  Company stationery.

4.  Invoice numbers (in sequence).

5.  Telephone numbers.  

9. Fraud in the Award of the Contract

Award of contract to a party who is not the lowest responsible, responsive bidder. 

Disqualifying  any qualified bidder. 

Allowing a low bidder to withdraw without justification. 

Failure to forfeit bid bonds when a contractor withdraws improperly. 

Material changes in the contract shortly after award. 

Advance information  of who is going to win a major competition. 

Awards made to contractors with an apparent history of poor performance. 

Awards made to the lowest of a very few bidders without re-advertising considerations or without adequate publicity. 

Awards made that include items other than those contained in bid specifications. 

Awards made without adequate documentation of all pre-award and post-award actions including all understandings or oral agreements. 

10. Negotiation of a Contract

Back-dating of the contract signed by unauthorized person. 

Giving information only to one contractor.

Unauthorized release of information. 

Release of information to unauthorized persons. 

Weakening the Government's negotiating position through disclosures to the contractor selected for award. 

Contractor misrepresentation as to costs during negotiations. 

Non compliance of Bhutan Schedule Rates. 

11. Post-Award Phase 

Certification of goods without conducting physical inspection.

Certification of services without conducting physical inspection. 

Action not taken for the non compliance of the terms and conditions.  

Contractors are not required to return excess materials. 

Materials  provided to the contractor even though the contractor is being paid to provide them. 

Unsuccessful bidders usually become sub contractors after the contract is awarded. 

Double payment for the same items and no recoupment. 

Double payment for the same service  and no recoupment. 

Use of Immigration employees to perform parts of contracted work. 

Contract files are either incomplete. 

Missing required documents or the contract. 

Alteration in the contract documents. 

Shipment of  Government supplies to   non-Government addresses. 

Shipment of  Government equipments to   non-Government addresses. 

Entry on contractors records of fictitious or inordinate time frames and dates. 

Substitution of the actually ordered products   by used or inferior products.              

12. Non regular reconciliation’s of accounts related to:                

1.  Contract payments.

2.  Daily transactions.

3.  Inventory.

13. Defective Pricing 

Persistent defective pricing. 

Similar patterns of repeated defective pricing. 

Failure to correct known system deficiencies. 

Failure to update cost or pricing data with knowledge that past activity showed that prices have decreased. 

Non disclosure of cost issues that will reduce proposal costs.

Denial by responsible contractor employees of the existence of historical records that are subsequently found. 

Utilization of unqualified personnel to develop for estimates. 

Indications of falsification or alteration of supporting data. 

Distortion of the overhead accounts. 

Distortion of  base information by the transfer of charges or accounts that have a material impact on Government contracts. 

Failure to make complete disclosure of  geo physo data known to responsible contractor personnel. 

Failure to make complete disclosure of  cultural data known to responsible contractor personnel. 

Protracted delay in release of data to the Government to preclude possible price reductions. 

Employment of people known to have previously perpetrated fraud against the Government. 

Inflated or unusual ocean freight.

Inflated or unusual air freight.

Inflated or unusual  freight.

Inflated or unusual insurance charges.

Inflated or unusual taxes. 

Excessive or prohibited commodity transport and/or storage charges. 

Identical or nearly identical high salary history data on employees or consultants. 

14. Collusive Bidding and Price Fixing 

Agreements to adhere to published price lists. 

Agreements to raise prices by a specified increment. 

Agreements to establish, adhere to, or eliminate discounts. 

Agreements not to advertise prices. 

Agreements to maintain specified price differentials based on quantity, type or size of product. 

Failure of Qualified, capable bidders to bid without valid reasons. 

Contractors always bidding against each other or conversely  not biding against one another. 

Successful bidder repeatedly subcontracts work to companies that submitted higher. 

Occurrence of regular low bids in a certain area or in a fixed rotation with other bidders. 

Failure of original bidders to re-bid. 

Appearance of higher bidding on some bids.

Frequently change in bidders price in a pattern. 

Joint venture bids  when both had technical and production capacity. 

Appearance or identical calculation 

Appearance or identical spelling errors in two or more competitive bids.

Submission of bids  by one firm for other firms. 

Competitors regularly socialize. 

Assertions by employees, former employees, or competitors that an agreement to fix bids and prices or otherwise restrain trade exists. 

Bid prices appear to drop whenever a new or infrequent bidder submits a bid. 

Competitors exchange any form of price information among themselves.  

Statements by a representative of a contractor that his company does not sell in a particular area.

Statements by a supplier that  only a particular firm sells in that area. 

Statements by a bidder that it is not their turn to receive a job. 

Statements by a bidder that it is another bidder's turn.

15. Cost Mischarging 

Excessive labor charges.

Unusual labor charges. 

Abrupt changes in labor charge levels for no apparent reason. 

Labor time and charges inconsistent with project progress. 

Inability of contractor to produce  immediately muster roll or attendance register on demand. 

Muster roll or attendance register that show consistent erasures. 

Muster roll or attendance register that show consistent alterations. 

Low level work charged to high level wage earners. 

16. Product Substitution 

Payment of non delivered supplies. 

Delivery of look-alike goods made from non-specification materials. 

Non testing of materials as required by the contract specifications. 

Providing foreign made products where domestic were required. 

Boxes with part of the label consistently wiped out.  ("Made in India" marked out). 

Commodities, consistently defaced in the same area with grind marks. 

Commodities, consistently defaced in the same area with wooden hammer handles with sanding marks. 

Removal of ID or specifications of the machines. 

Commodities that appear used when new, was ordered. 

Multiple commodities where some appear different from other.

Purchase  of commodity domestically, but originally shipped from a foreign port. 

Missing source origin documentation. 

17. Progress Payment Fraud 

Claim of payment for work not done. 

Claim for payment of materials at site without purchasing the materials.  

18. Criminal and Regulatory Violations by Employees 

Employees, including contractors and foreign nationals, who continually circumvent established procedures. 

Employees who initiate actions without proper prior approval. 

Sloppy handling of cash. 

Sloppy handling of commodities. 

Awarding of a contract in any fashion outside of the letter and spirit of established procedures. 

Unusual or extravagant behavior or spending. 

Unusual patterns of taking leave. 

Unusual or extravagant amount of mail sent to particular employees. 

Checks cashed that appear to have been processed through unusual banking channels. 

Cash not turned in properly. 

Actions that tend to obstruct an audit trail. 

Unusual or unauthorized interaction between an employee and bidder or contractor. 

Frequent or unusual and/or unexplained travel. 

Unusual and/or unexplained possession of large amounts of U.S. or local currency. 

Abrupt change in living style. 

Part II. Frauds committed by Contractors and individuals 

1.Pre Award Fraud 

Rigged Specifications.

Receipt of only one bid.

One bid significantly lower than others.

Sole source procurement.

Protests filed by bidders. 

2. Collusive Bidding 

Small number of companies doing similar work on what appears to be a rotating basis.

Awards to companies for that reflect a geographic pattern indicating collusive division of territory.

Fairly wide disparity between the winning and losing bids.

Unsuccessful bidders who become subcontractors after contract award.

One or more of these situations indicate the possibility of collusive bidding. 

3.Contractor Fraud 

(i).False claims and statements 

Cost proposal data that is incorrect or less than current or complete. 

False representations concerning quality of product being offered or ability to perform adequately and timely. 

Billings (including progress payments) not adequately supported by project status or reliable cost data. 

Duplicate or altered invoices used as support for payment.

Costs charged to the project that should be charged to another project or to overhead.

Direct cost from a contract charged to overhead, thereby distributing the loss to other contracts.

Double billing, i.e., charging employees full-time to two or more jobs. 

Reviewing the progress of work performed.

Testing the quality of work performed.

Reviewing all billings to ensure that they are for work which has been satisfactorily performed.

Being alert to sudden and unexpected cost growth or over-runs.

Contract slippage.

Modifications to contracts because of contractor inability to perform.

Significant increase in price without corresponding increase in work.

Substantial subcontracting without the knowledge and approval of the contracting officer.

Substantial funds expended on the work by contractor prior to contract award.

Sole source procurement with substantial subcontracting.

Prime contractor requiring subcontractor to utilize prime's labor and/or equipment.

Inadequately supported charges for consultant fees, equipment rental, and travel.

Use of employees or consultants with skill levels below that proposed.

Inflated unit prices for items from contractor stock. 

Failure to Meet Specifications. 

Falsification of Government-Furnished Property Records. 

Co-Mingling of Contracts. 

False Invoices. 

Duplicate Contract Payments. 

Change Orders Abuse. 

(ii).Procurement  by Government Personnel

Excessive small purchases of tools

Excessive Small Purchases of equipments. 

Split Purchases. 

Phantom Contractors. 

Altered Receipts/Vouchers for Impress Fund Reimbursement. 

Duplicate Payments from both voucher and Impress Fund. 

Duplicate Payments from Impress Fund.

(iii).Bribery and Illegal Gratuities 

Co-mingling of Contracts. 

Rigged Specifications : 

(iv).Collusive Bidding 

Identical bids are received. 

A number of bids are received that are much higher than published costs of previous contracts of the same type, or of previous bids by the same firms for similar contracts. 

Fewer firms bid than would normally be expected from that industry. 

There is an inexplicably large gap between the winning bid and all other bids. 

Apparent recurring patterns of low bids. 

Successful bidder subcontracts work to companies that submitted higher bids on the same project. 

Close bids on non-standard items with no suggested retail price. 

Correlation between the contractors that win the bids and the size of the contracts. 

Competing contractors regularly socialize, or contractors and Government. 

procurement personnel socialize.

Companies Conducting Business under Several Names. 

Conflict of Interest Situations: 

Failure to Properly Monitor Contract Performance. 

Failure to Meet Specifications. 

Same Individual Authorized to Order and Receive for Goods and Services. 

Unvarying Patterns in Small Purchases. 

Frequent Complaints by Users of Supplies of Services. 

Service Contract Specifications Include Bid Schedule Items for which there is little or No Requirement. 

Splitting Large Requirements. 

Government Estimates and Contract Award Prices are Consistently Very Close. 

Contractor Complains of Late Payment by the Agency. 

Mischarging Costs Among Contracts. 

Duplicate Payment. 

Down grading Serviceable Property to Scrap. 

Abnormal Increase in Consumption of Fuel or Supply Items. 

Poor Physical Security. 

Receipt of Items That Cannot be Traced to a Valid Requisition: 

Failure to De-obligate Canceled Purchase Orders: 

Failure to Conduct Inventories or Alteration of Inventory Records :

Excessive Parts Replacement in Vehicle Maintenance. 

Government Funds Used for Replacement Parts in New Vehicles. 

Cashier Fail to Return a Copy of Paid Travel Vouchers to Employees. 

Disbursement not Processed into the Accounting System on a Timely Basis. 

Excessive Numbers of Travel Claims for Expenses that Can Be Accepted without a Supporting Receipt. 

Repeated Changes to Timecards/Excessive Overtime. 

Employee Refuses Promotion, Leave, or Job Changes. 

Control of the Key Resource Management Function by an individual. 

Purchase Orders Being Used for Personal Orders. 

Insufficient Documentation for Foreign Transfer Allowance. 

Large Year-end Purchases for Non specific items. 

Mixing  inventories to Prevent Identification of Purchase with Special Funds. 

Journal Vouchers Being Used to Transfer Over-Obligated Purchase. 

Submission of Copies of Paid Receipt to Collect Reimbursement. 

Bypassing of Supervisory Reviews or Computer Edits. 

(v).Overstatement of Household Goods Shipment Weights

Body Bumping.

1.  Fuel Bumping.

Packing/Equipment Bumping.

Double Billing on Small Shipments.

Weight Bumping.    

False Tickets.     

Switching Trucks.

Excluding Crating Materials.

4. Financial Fraud           

Excessive changes in accounting principles.

Disregard for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. 

Excessive or unjustified changes in accounting personnel. 

Refusal/failure to allow an independent audit. 

Excessive destruction of controlled documents. 

Excessive number of photocopies of invoices in files. 

Access of an individual to excessive  cash. 

A pattern of second endorsements on payroll checks. 

Periodic or excessive conversion of cash for exchange items. 

Excessive cash transactions are a poor business practice.  

Sale of assets or transfer for what appears to be less than adequate consideration. 

Assets are sold but possession is maintained.  

Post-dated checks. 

Lack of sufficient vouchers and supporting documents 

Excessive bad debt write-offs. 

Excessive spoilage/damage goods. 

Excessive or unpaid loans to non-critical employees. 

Encumbrances and liens shortly before bankruptcy.

Excessive or insufficient freight expense relative to inventory purchased. 

Failure to reconcile bank statements.

Inventory Component ratios are out of acceptable limits. 

Excessive number of employees relative to production. 

Business dealings with no apparent economic purpose. 

Excessive/questionable dealing with subsidiaries. 

Use of management fronts, such as interlocking directorates, alter egos.

Inappropriate trends in relation to other events.

Significant lack of internal controls. 

Lack of competitive bidding. 

Questionable and significant changes in key financial ratios.    

5. Checks and Other Financial Records 

Compare check numbers against date issued.  Checks should be issued in sequence by check number and date. 

See if more than one check in sequence was issued to the same vendor.  It would be an unusual situation for this to occur. 

Compare computer-generated checks with manually issued checks.  This is usually indicated by a different series of check numbers.  The method by which the checks were generated to a specific vendor should be consistent. 

Check for differences in addresses, such as slightly different post office numbers incorrect post office numbers or different zip codes for the same address different street numbers or alternating addresses. 

Look for checks to different vendors going to the same mailing address. 

Look for checks to different vendors deposited in the same bank account. 

Deposits of checks made by each vendor should be consistent with the same account. 

Look for checks that are prepared by different typing machines than those before and after the checks in question. 

Be observant for checks issued in round amounts. 

Checks may normally include the payee's mailing address for sue in a "window" envelope.  If a check is found where the address is missing or incomplete, it may be an indication that the check was delivered by other than normal means. 

Hand-written endorsements on the back of business checks should be noted.  Most businesses use a stamp indication For Deposit Only or "Deposit to the Account of" etc. 

Erasures or white-outs should always be suspect. 

Folded or long-held checks should also raise suspicion. 

6. Assumed Names, Records of Incorporation 

Determine names of major corporate executives, staff members, members of the financial accounting departments. 

Check these names against appropriate register of assumed names, incorporation records, business tax rolls, etc. to identify any businesses these individuals may be associated with. 

If any businesses are discovered, documents the names, addresses, dates of incorporation, and persons signing the records. 

If possible, obtain a complete list of the vendors the company uses with addresses and expenditures for the last several years. 

Compare the names of businesses identified through checks of assumed names and corporation records, etc. with the vendors on the list.  If there are any matches, this would be an indication there is a questionable relationship between the vendor and the other companies. 

Indicators 

Vendors used as a front to launder embezzled funds.

Vendors used to provide legitimate services but at highly inflated prices.

Vendors used to direct business to a member of a family or close associate.

7. Glossary of Fraud Schemes and Terms 

Abuse: In some cultures, a minor Fraud or infraction.

Accomplice: In fraud, a partner to the fraud scheme. See also Perpetrator and Shill.

Advance Fee Scheme: The Fraudster collects fees in advance without ever intending to fulfil the agreement to provide services or products.

Affidavit: A sworn statement.

Affiliate Bidding: A condition in purchasing when multiple bids are tendered for a contract from a single company under various names to give the appearance of competition.

Agent: A person with an agency relationship (employee or independent contractor).

"At will": An employment situation where the employee is not protected from arbitrary firing -- the employee works only at the pleasure of management and may be terminated at any time for no reason. Contrast "For cause."

Backdate: To post a date on a document earlier than the actual creation date for purposes of deception.

Back Door: In computer fraud, unauthorized entry point or weakness discovered by a Hacker. Similar to Trapdoor, except that back doors are usually pre-existing weaknesses.

Bait and Switch: In consumer fraud, advertising a low cost item and then steering the customer to a higher priced item when they come to buy, claiming the low priced item was "sold out."

Bank Examiner Scheme: The Fraudster poses as a Bank Examiner who is trying to catch a dishonest teller. The Bank Examiner needs the victim to withdraw a substantial sum from their account to test the teller. The Bank Examiner then asks the victim to hand over the cash for a receipt while they use the cash as evidence. The fraudulent Bank Examiner then disappears with the cash ,and the receipt turns out to be worthless.

Bankruptcy Fraud: The Perpetrator files a notice of bankruptcy. He then approaches each of his creditors (who have received a cop of the notice of bankruptcy) and tells each one in turn that they are the special one that he wants to see get paid at least something. The creditor often settles for 10% of the amount owed. Once a settlement with one creditor is reached, the Perpetrator approaches the next creditor, and so on until all creditors have been settled with at a small fraction of the outstanding amounts owed. The Perpetrator then withdraws his petition for bankruptcy, have extinguished most of his debt for a small fraction of the original amount.

Bid Rigging: In purchasing, any scheme that gives the appearance of competitive bids but is actually not competitive because the participants establish the winner before submitting bids for the contract. See Affiliate Bidding and Bid Rotation.

Bid Rotation: In purchasing when bidders for contracts Collude to distribute work among themselves by establishing which among them will win particular bids.

Boiler Room Operation: A fraud scheme that attempts to sell worthless securities (or similar assets) over the telephone through high pressure sales tactics. If the money is sent in or the credit card number given out, there is nothing of value received.

Bribery: To offer money in exchange for favourite treatment or to compel or influence some action. Official (government employee or elected official) bribery involves a promise for acting or withholding some official act. Official bribery (Corruption) is unlawful in most cultures. Commercial Bribery is known as "facilitating payments" in some cultures and is not a crime in most cultures, although it often is against the organization's policies and procedures.

Bucket Shop: A securities fraud scheme that pretends to buy and sell securities for customers, but actually never invests the money it receives. The scheme depends upon stock price manipulation or a continuously rising market to encourage more buyers than sellers. Also associated sometimes with the Pump-and-Dump scheme.

Case Method: In fraud Investigation, a six-step process of gathering evidence in order to identify a Suspect.

Chain of Custody: In evidentiary matters, the record of possession from original discovery until produced at trial. If the chain of custody is broken or unclear, the Evidence may be challenged as not the original or not in its original condition.

Chain Letter Schemes: Letters with names listed and claims that the recipient of the letter, by putting their name on the list, removing the top name and sending them some nominal amount, then mailing the new list to some number of friends and acquaintances, will receive a lot of riches in the mail. There is usually also a "curse" or bad luck associated with individuals who "break the chain."

Check Kiting: See Kiting.

Code of Conduct: See Code of Ethics.

Code of Ethics: A document adopted by an organization that describes the expectations of the organization of employee and management behaviour to all employees, suppliers, customers, the government, and the community.

Coerce: To influence action against someone's will, usually by threat.

Collateral Frauds: Fraudulent representing collateral for loans that (1) does not exist, (2) is not owned by the loan applicant, or (3) is grossly over-valued, or some or all of these.

Collude: In the context of Fraud, to act together for a fraudulent purpose.

Commercial Bribery: Giving and accepting payments to favour or not favour a commercial transaction or relationship. See also Bribery and Corruption.

Computer Virus: See Virus.

Con: Short form of Confidence Game.

Conceal(ment):  The second step in committing a Fraud.  To hide from view.

Confidence Game: A fraud scheme where the Perpetrator gains the confidence of the Mark to defraud the Mark in some way. Perfect Confidence Games are so effective that Marks do not report them to the authorities for fear of looking foolish or because the game involved something unlawful (such as illegal gambling).

Conflict of Interest: An employee owes a duty to the employer to act in the interest of the employer (and no other) when carrying out the duties of an employer. A Conflict of Interest exists when the employee has some personal kinship, friendship or financial interest in the transaction that may divide the employee's interests and put his duty to his employer in jeopardy.

Conspiracy: Two or more persons come together for the purpose of committing a Fraud.

Conversion:  The third step in a Fraud.  To exchange for personal gain.

"Cooking the Books": Altering the official accounts to deceive.  See also Journal Entry Fraud.

Corruption: Bribery of a government official. See also Commercial Bribery.

Cost of Goods Sold changes: Unusual changes in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales may be an indicator of the theft of revenue or theft of finished goods inventory.  See Fictitious Refunds Fraud.

Covert: Hidden or secret, as in Covert Operations.

Covert Operation: A plan or activity to obtain evidence through Operatives or Agents whose true role is undisclosed to the target. Examples of covert operations include Undercover work and Pretense. See also Ruse.

Cyber-crime: Referring to frauds perpetrated on the Internet or through the use of computers.

Cycle Counts:  In inventory control, counting various portions of the inventory frequently until it is all counted (vs. counting the whole inventory once a quarter or once a year).

Defalcation: A fancy word for Fraud, theft or other dishonest act relating to a position of trust in an organization.

Defamation: The act of knowingly uttering Slander or printing Libel that is untrue but harms another person's character and reputation.

Denial of Access attack: A computer Virus or computer program run to generate many thousands of requests to the central computer, thereby tying up the processor and denying legitimate requests of access.

Deposition:  A pre-trial legal proceeding in which a person is questioned under oath by an attorney, usually witnessed and recorded by audio, video, and/or written verbatim notes.  The purpose of the deposition is to discover Evidence that may be used later at trial or to induce the person to make statements of knowledge or fact that can be used at trial.

Directory Advertising Schemes: Fraudulent invoices claiming that the company is listed in a business directory and requesting payment. There may or may not be such a directory, and the directory may or may not ever be distributed or distributed as widely as claimed. For certain, no one ever ordered or authorized the directory advertisement. See also Shipping Short.

Direct Inward System Access: A feature on PBX (Private Branch Exchange) telephone equipment that is vulnerable to fraud. It is used to allow people outside of the office to call anywhere in the world through the DISA port using a toll-free number and a PIN (Personal Identification Number). Hackers attack the PBX through the toll-free number and try to break in by guessing the PIN. If successful, the hackers can use the telephone network of the victim to place calls billed back to the victim.

DISA: See Direct Inward System Access.

Documentary Evidence: Written or photographic representations of fact.

Dual Custody: A method of protecting cash by requiring all cash assets handled by two people (two signatures, two keys, two people counting, etc.).

Dummy: Fictitious.

"Dumpster Diving": Rummaging through someone's trash to obtain information.

Eavesdropping: See Electronic Surveillance.

Electronic Surveillance: Listening and/or recording activities using electronic means (audio and video) without being detected. In some jurisdictions, electronic surveillance is unlawful without permission from all parties.

Embezzlement: Theft of money from an employer by an employee using false entries in accounting records to cover up the crime.  See also Journal Entry Fraud.

Employee Account Fraud:  When employees are also customers, employees may make unauthorized adjustments to their accounts (including write-off).

Entrapment: Unlawfully lured into a crime by a police officer. A common defense in a criminal activity where the criminal claims they were innocent and would not have been involved in the crime otherwise.

Expense Report Fraud: Charging unauthorized or fictitious amounts on an expense report. See Padding Expense Accounts.

Exposure: The potential for loss.

Extortion: The offer to keep from harm in exchange for money or other consideration. The demand for Restitution in exchange for not prosecuting a crime is a form of extortion.

Factors of Fraud: Opportunity (an opening or control weakness to be able to commit the fraud), Pressure (a problem that cannot be shared or resolved), and Attitude (a propensity to steal or the ability to rationalize fraudulent behavior). All frauds have these three factors as a cause.

False Claims: Claims for reimbursement by an employee or contractor for nonexistent or inflated expenses. False claims can be for business expenses or personal expenses (such as medical).  See Padding Expense Accounts.

False Credentials: Misrepresenting education or experience or professional certification to fraudulently obtain and hold employment.

False Imprisonment: During an Interrogation, blocking the subject's avenue of escape, essentially holding the person against their will. Unless the person has been arrested, they may not be detained against their will at any time.

False Pretense: See Pretense, Ruse or Subterfuge.

Fictitious Refunds Scheme: Preparing false documents of refunds to cover thefts of cash. A retail cashiering fraud.  See Cost of Goods Sold changes.

Fictitious Sales: A scheme to record sales to fictitious customers or fictitious sales to existing customers at the end of one period and reversing the transactions at the beginning of the next period. The purpose of the scheme is to inflate sales to create false profit statements or earn unwarranted bonuses. Excessive credit memos or sales cancellations at the beginning of an accounting period can be an indicator of this fraud.

Fiduciary Duty: The acts necessary (usually of an authorized employee or agent) to carry out a responsibility to care for assets prudently.  See Embezzlement.

Firewall:  A software program that protects direct access to a local area network by establishing a "public" network in front of the "trusted" network.  The purpose of the program is to secure data and systems from Hackers.

"For cause": An employment arrangement where employees may only be terminated for a proven cause. For contrast, see "At will."

Forensic: Suitable for use in a court proceeding.

Forensic Auditing: Examination of a business process for evidence of Fraud.

Forgery: Creation of false documents or altering existing documents, especially financial instruments or other authorizations.

Fraud: A theft, concealment and conversion to personal gain of another's money, physical assets, information, or time.

Fraud Scenarios:  A method of developing mental models of possible Frauds.  "Thinking like a crook."

Fraudster: One who commits the Fraud.

"Ghost" employees: Fictitious employees on the payroll, for whom the supervisor or manager receives the extra paychecks.

Hacker: (Old) One who enjoys unraveling the mysteries of the computer. (Modern) A person who attacks another's computer and seeks to gain unauthorized access by hacking (breaking down) the computer's logical security.

Hearsay: A weak form of evidence that is an opinion of the witness or that is not personally and directly known to them.

Hidden Bank Accounts: A possible indication of Embezzlement, Bribery or Kickback frauds.

Hot Line: A telephone number to report suspected Fraud. Often hot lines are handled as anonymous tips.

Impeach: In Testimony, to catch the person in a lie or contradiction of fact.

Improprieties: A polite word for Frauds and wrongdoings.

Inflated Inventory:  An indication of Embezzlement or possible theft of inventory.  See Inventory Shrinkage.

Influence Pedaling: The offer by a government official to use their office to influence actions for a private party in return for something of value.

Informant: A person, such as a co-worker or friend of the accused, used in the investigation of a fraud who may know something about the crime but is otherwise not involved.

Insider Trading: Using business information not released to the public to reap profits trading in the financial markets.

Interrogation: An interview of a suspect conducted for the main purpose of obtaining an admission of guilt, to identify and neutralize defenses the target may raise, and to obtain information used to impeach the Suspect.

Interview: A structured (planned) question and answer session with a person designed to elicit information.

Inventory Shrinkage:  Theft of physical inventory.

Investigation: A structured gathering of Documentary Evidence and Testimony to solve a reported Fraud.

Irregularity: A polite word for Fraud.

Journal Entry Fraud: Using accounting journal entries to fraudulently adjust financial statements.  See also Embezzlement.

Kickback: A payment by a vendor to an employee at the request of the employee in order for the vendor to receive favorable treatment.

Kiting: Using several bank accounts in different banks, making deposits and writing checks against the accounts before the deposit checks clear the banking system, creating a "float" of money out of nothing more than the lag in time while checks clear and post to their respective accounts.

Lapping: Stealing a customer payment and then using a subsequent customer payment to cover the previous customer's account. This overlapping payments creates a "float" of money that can be used as long as all payments are eventually posted. What usually occurs is that the lapping process builds up like a giant pyramid until it falls apart when not enough payments are available to cover the amounts owed.

Libel: Knowingly publishing false statements about another person that creates harm.

Lie Detector: See Polygraph.

Lifestyle changes: A possible indicator of theft is the sudden change in lifestyle such as exhibiting more than usual wealth.

"Lowballing": Placing an unusually low bid to win the business. Often with the intent to inflate the price later with extras or change orders. Also can indicate a defective Request for Proposal.

Maintenance Port: An access point in the PBX (Private Branch Exchange) telephone equipment that is vulnerable to fraud. The port exists to allow the manufacturer's repair technicians to call into the PBX from a remote location and diagnose problems or administer maintenance software patches. Also known as the Remote Access Unit, or RAU.

Malicious Prosecution: Targeting someone for prosecution without reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Mark: The intended victim of a Swindle or Confidence Game.

Misappropriation: A polite word for theft.

MLM: See Multi-Level Marketing.

Moving Surveillance: Following the target of surveillance from one position to another, as in Shadowing or Tailing a suspect.

Multi-Level Marketing: A form of Pyramid Scheme, not necessarily fraudulent, where sales are made to retail customers and commissions earned through many levels of the chain within the pyramid. The chain is built and expanded by each layer constantly recruiting more people to sell the product or service.

Negative Invoicing: Using an invoice for a negative amount to cover a theft of a customer payment. The negative invoice is less noticeable than a credit memorandum and usually under less stringent control. A negative invoice is a symptom of possible theft.

Nigerian Letter: A fraud scheme that now includes fax and email versions of a letter from a supposed official in Nigeria. The official has a large sum of money (often stated as $20 to $30 million) to transfer out of the country. Due to exchange controls, the official asks for the victim's help with the transfer. All that is required to earn a hefty reward/commission is to furnish the Nigerian official with your bank account number, and they will handle the rest. What actually happens is that the Perpetrator depletes the victim's account.

Obstruction of Justice: Impeding a lawful Investigation by such acts as providing false documents, false testimony, destruction of evidence, and intimidating witnesses.

Ombudsman:  A person who acts as an advocate for employee grievances against the organization.  Also, a neutral party to whom employees can turn to report Fraud.

Operative: A person acting on your behalf or under your care, custody or control in a specific manner. A source or Informant working Undercover in Covert Operations is an operative. There is no agency relationship with an operative as with an Agent.

Overbilling schemes: Padding invoices with extraneous or fictitious items. Intentional duplicate billing, such as billing two parties for the same work is also an overbilling scheme.

Overt: Open, not hidden. See Covert for contrast.

Out-of-Route: Outside sales or service workers who deviate from their normal route or time schedule, such as conducting personal errands or taking excessively long coffee or lunch breaks.

Outstanding Items: In checking operations, checks that have been written but not cleared through the bank. An equivalent banking term for interbank transactions.

Padding Expense Accounts: Adding extra expense items or inflating the value of legitimate expense items to obtain unwarranted reimbursements.

Padding Overtime: Adding extra hours to falsely inflate the payroll and earn unwarranted pay.

Palming: To conceal in the hand.

Perjury:  Lying under oath, including  sworn court appearances, Depositions, Affidavits, and other sworn statements and documents.

Perpetrator: The person who commits the Fraud.

Personal Identification Number: A code used to access personal data or accounts.

Pilfering: Theft, usually referring to theft of physical goods. In retail business, customer theft is known as Shoplifting and employee theft is called pilfering. Occasionally used also with theft of cash, especially petty cash or for small thefts.

PIN: See Personal Identification Number.

Pigeon Drop: A fraud scheme that involves a wallet/purse/envelope with a large sum of money in it but no identification. The Perpetrator and Accomplice, together with the victim "finds" the wallet, and the victim is persuaded to withdraw a sum of money as "good faith" to share in the cache. The victim is distracted and the Perpetrators steal the money and disappear with it.

"Pingponging": In medical insurance or Workers Compensation Fraud, referring patients to other doctors in the same clinic in order to claim reimbursement for "consultations" rather than for actual treatment.  See also False Claims.

Polygraph: A machine for recording a number of life signs (breathing rate, pulse, etc.) to aid in determining if a Suspect is lying. Also known as a Lie Detector.

Ponzi Scheme: A fraud in which a high rate of return is promised on investments. The first few investors receive the high rate of return from part of the investments of later victims. At no time is any actual investment made.

Pretense: Also False Pretense. To represent something to be what it is not. See Ruse and Subterfuge.

"Pump-and-Dump": Manipulating stock prices by artificially creating demand through rumor, high pressure sales tactics, or multiple large orders. The price is "pumped" upwards and then when other investors join the trend, the original investors "dump" the stock in a rapid sell-off. See also Bucket Shop.

Pyramid Scheme: A commercial version of the Chain Letter scheme where the Fraudster sells bogus distributorships, franchises or business opportunity plans to people who are in turn induced to do the same. See also Multi-Level Marketing.

"Razoring": Removing the last check, invoice, purchase order or other sequentially numbered item from a pad of items by carefully cutting with a razor around the staple holding the pad together. In this manner, fictitious transactions can be documented on official forms.

RAU: Remote Access Unit. Also known as the Maintenance Port.

Reconciliation: A process of comparing details with control totals, such as checks paid during the month and deposits made that month with the change in bank balance at end of the month.

Red Flags: Symptoms and indicators (of Fraud).

Remote Access Unit: See Maintenance Port.

Request for Proposal: A request to potential vendors for tender offers or bids to perform a service or provide a product (or both) to solve a particular business problem. See also Request for Quote.

Request for Quote: A request to potential vendors for price quotes and delivery terms -- usually for much simpler procurement requirements than Request for Proposals.

Restitution: Restoring money or property to the victim of a Fraud.

Resume Inflation: See False Credentials.

RFP: See Request for Proposal.

RFQ: See Request for Quote.

Rube: A slang term for a Mark or victim, especially someone who appears naïve.

Ruse: A scheme that tries to make something appear as something else. Hiding the true meaning or acting out a lie. A Subterfuge or Pretense.

Sabotage: Destroying or delaying some part of the business process.

"Salami":  In banking, a fraud that involves taking all of the "round-down" fractional cents from periodic interest payments and crediting them to a single account.  Thus each transaction has only a thin slice removed.

"Salting" cash: Testing accounts receivable employee honesty by placing some cash in the customer receivables process to see if it is reported as cash or stolen.

Secure Socket Layer: A protocol used in electronic commerce to afford more security to transactions on the Internet.

Self-approval: The act of authorizing a transaction for one's own benefits or gains, or an act of approval for an activity in which the approval authority participated.

Sewer Service: Many consumer frauds rely on litigation to win judgments to collect the proceeds of the fraud. These organizations limit the ability of the victim to defend against this litigation by not informing them of the suit (literally dropping the Subpoena "down the sewer") and filing false Affidavits in court that the litigation papers had been properly served.

Shadowing: Following the suspect or target of Surveillance from place to place to observe activities without being detected.

Shell Game: A game where a pebble or dried pea is hidden under one of three shells or cans. The Perpetrator moves the shells around quickly, often Palming the pebble, and then asks the Mark to choose the shell where the pea is located. A common street Confidence Game. See also Sleight-of-hand.

Shill: An person in a Confidence Game that acts as a participant to draw in the Mark. An Accomplice -- one who is paid to play as part of a Swindle. Derived from casino gambling, where the shill is a paid employee used to attract other gamblers.

Shoplifting:  Customer theft from retail inventory.  See also Pilfering.

"Short-and-Over": An account used in cashiering operations to track the imbalance of cash to sales recorded. A perfectly balanced cash operation day-after-day, with no shorts or overs, is a symptom of possible theft. It is unusual to never make mistakes handling money.

Shorting: In medical frauds, delivering less prescription medicine than actually charged to the insurance company or government.

Short Shipping: Shipping less than the quantity shown on the invoice (or shipping nothing at all; see Directory Advertising Scheme).

"Shoulder Surfing": Observing someone using a PIN (Personal Identification Number) by covertly looking over their shoulder, sometimes with the aid of binoculars or video camera with zoom lens.

Shrinkage:  See Inventory Shrinkage.

Slander: Knowingly uttering false statements about another person that causes harm.

Sleight-of-hand: A magician's trick. The ability to conceal a physical action by distracting the participant. See also Palming.

Spying: See Surveillance.

SSL: See Secure Socket Layer.

Stakeout: See Stationary Surveillance.

Stationary Surveillance: Observation of activities of a suspect from one vantage point. Also known as a Stakeout.

Statutory Employee: An employee by action and tax law, but not actually on the payroll. There are potential violations of USA tax and employment benefits laws if independent contractors and consultants are found to be statutory employees instead.

Suborn:  The act of Bribery.

Subterfuge: Masking the true nature or reason for an action.

Surveillance: Gathering evidence through observation from outside of the operation (contrasted with Undercover). Surveillance can be Moving Surveillance, Stationary Surveillance or Electronic Surveillance. Also known as Spying or Eavesdropping.

Suspect (n.): The target of the fraud Investigation. See also Perpetrator and Fraudster.

Suspect (v.): To place under suspicion of wrongdoing.

Swindle: A scheme to obtain money by Ruse or False Pretense. See also Confidence Game.

Tailing: See Shadowing.

Testimony: Oral evidence (representations of fact) taken by Interview or Interrogation. Testimonial evidence is necessarily weaker than Documentary Evidence.

Theft:  The first step in a Fraud.  Unlawfully taking.

"Thief's Calculator": A collection of innocent-looking bits and pieces near the cash register for the purpose of tracking the amount of cash stolen by Skimming.

"Tone at the Top": The messages and actions of senior management in relation to Fraud detection and deterrence.

Trapdoor: In computer fraud, a means of unauthorized access to the computer operating system or files, usually placed by a Hacker.

Trojan Horse: A type of computer program that remains inert (and possibly hidden) until activated by an external event such as a date. Used as Viruses to disrupt or destroy computer operations, or used to open a Trapdoor for unauthorized access.

Unauthorized Use:  Policies should be in place to determine what business resources may be used for personal business and at what times.  Other use constitutes Theft.

Undercover: Secret or Covert Operations where a person works under an assumed identity, adopts a disguise, or takes on an assumed role in order to gather evidence.

Under-ring: To record less than the actual sales price. Usually refers to a cashier ringing a sale on a cash register. Under-rings may be a method used in Skimming cash by the cashier, or they may be used to give unauthorized discounts to an Accomplice.

Unethical: Behavior that does not meet community standards for "right behavior," but that does not violate any laws either.

Unlawful: Behavior that violates established laws.

Virus: In computer operations, a program that is deliberately released to a system with the ability to replicate itself and spread by attaching unauthorized data to files. Viruses can be benign, just taking up disk storage space, or they may be vicious and actually destroy data or deny authorized access.

Voids: In cashiering, ringing a "Void" to cancel a previous sale. Excessive voids may be a sign of theft.

Whistleblowing: The act of an employee revealing suspected fraud (usually involving senior management) to an outside third party.

Witnesses:  People who may have information of a Fraud based on observation.

Worker's Compensation Fraud: False claims for on-the-job injuries. Usually takes the Collusion of employee and unscrupulous doctors to submit false diagnoses. Back injuries (soft tissue strains) and stress are the most common ailments used in this scheme.

Indicators of Potential Fraud-Personnel

Economic Stress

  • Family illness

  • Divorce

  • Family unemployment

  • High Debt

  • Financial Losses

  • Pressure of the world

 Life style

  • Living beyond means

  • Possible alcohol or drug problems

  • Gambling

  • Vices

 Work Habits

  • Excessive overtime

  • No vacations

  • Excessive sick or vacation leave taken

  • Avoids or is too friendly to employees

  • Secretiveness or defensiveness.

  • Turning down promotions or transfers.

  • Avoidance by other employees.

  • Manger’s pressure to show good results.

  • Job cutbacks or down sizing.

 Attitude

  • Job dissatisfaction/unhappy employees.

  • Feeling underpaid.

  • Unappreciated.

  • Greed.
    Pride in beating the system.

  • Domineering personality.

Opportunity

  • Close association with suppliers/customers.

  • Loose oversight to authorizations.

  • Lack of controls.

  • Independent review.

  • Too much trust/independence

Back to Top

 

Royal Audit Authority
Phone no: 975-2-322111/32833/324961 Fax no: 975-2-323491
Email:
webmaster